शुक्रवार, 11 सितंबर 2009

Aamras Movie Review Ratings



Review of the Film: Aamras (2009)

Verdict: Decent watch but will fail at Box office collection due to lack of star power, no negative review by any critic.
Overall Ratings: 2.3/5
Review Analysis - Based on 10 Reviews
Good: 1, Average: 8, Poor: 1

1. Taran Adarsh from Bollywood Hungama: 2/5
AAMRAS is interesting in parts only. However, the film will face an uphill task at the box-office because of lack of face-value and also, lack of hype ... Read this Review

2. Gaurav Malani from Filmfare, India Times, Times of India: 2/5
Aamras can qualify as a decent recipe for a good novel. It’s too dilute for a film and ends up being an ordinary fare. ‘Aam’ras! ... Read this Review

3. Udita Jhunjhunwal from DNA India: 2/5
Not very tasty ... Read Complete Movie Review

4. Shubhra Gupta from The Indian Express: 2/5
The good thing about `Aamras’ is that it gives us young adults who are not cloyingly saccharine all the time, but the story-telling and the plot points are interesting only intermittently ... Read this Review

5. Esha Razdan from RealBollywood.com: 2/5
Aamras needs a lot of strong word of mouth to bring in the audience and is fairly a good film ... See Full Movie Review

6. BharatStudent.com: 2/5
Just okay ... See Full Movie Review

7. Rajiv Vijayakar from Rajshri.com: 1.5/5
Four girls, their troubled friendship and no storyline. Thia Aamras is bland ... Read more

8. Avijit Ghosh from Economic Times, Times of India
Aamras is an ode to teenage friendship: bonding, crushes, heartbreaks, jealousies, everything a blend of sweet and sour ... Read more

9. Yahoo Overall Ratings: 4/5 (based on 2 ratings)
See Ratings

10. Chakpak Overall Ratings: 2.7/5 (based on 42 votes)
See Ratings

Aamras Film Details:-
Director: Rupali Guha
Banner: Walkwater Media, Alliance Media & Entertainment Pvt. Ltd.
Genre: Comedy / Drama
Producer: Sunil Doshi
Star Cast: Vega Tamotia, Ntasha Bhardwaj, Maanvi Gagroo, Anchal Sabharwal

For more movie reviews check out Hindi Movie Reviews
Share: